Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Jimmy Carter on religion and equality

All I can say is well said Jimmy Carter, I am with you 100 percent.

Losing my religion for equality.

  • Jimmy Carter
  • July 14, 2009

Women and girls have been discriminated against for too long in a twisted interpretation of the word of God.

I HAVE been a practising Christian all my life and a deacon and Bible teacher for many years. My faith is a source of strength and comfort to me, as religious beliefs are to hundreds of millions of people around the world. So my decision to sever my ties with the Southern Baptist Convention, after six decades, was painful and difficult. It was, however, an unavoidable decision when the convention's leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be "subservient" to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service.

This view that women are somehow inferior to men is not restricted to one religion or belief. Women are prevented from playing a full and equal role in many faiths. Nor, tragically, does its influence stop at the walls of the church, mosque, synagogue or temple. This discrimination, unjustifiably attributed to a Higher Authority, has provided a reason or excuse for the deprivation of women's equal rights across the world for centuries.

At its most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.

The impact of these religious beliefs touches every aspect of our lives. They help explain why in many countries boys are educated before girls; why girls are told when and whom they must marry; and why many face enormous and unacceptable risks in pregnancy and childbirth because their basic health needs are not met.

In some Islamic nations, women are restricted in their movements, punished for permitting the exposure of an arm or ankle, deprived of education, prohibited from driving a car or competing with men for a job. If a woman is raped, she is often most severely punished as the guilty party in the crime.

The same discriminatory thinking lies behind the continuing gender gap in pay and why there are still so few women in office in the West. The root of this prejudice lies deep in our histories, but its impact is felt every day. It is not women and girls alone who suffer. It damages all of us. The evidence shows that investing in women and girls delivers major benefits for society. An educated woman has healthier children. She is more likely to send them to school. She earns more and invests what she earns in her family.

It is simply self-defeating for any community to discriminate against half its population. We need to challenge these self-serving and outdated attitudes and practices - as we are seeing in Iran where women are at the forefront of the battle for democracy and freedom.

I understand, however, why many political leaders can be reluctant about stepping into this minefield. Religion, and tradition, are powerful and sensitive areas to challenge. But my fellow Elders and I, who come from many faiths and backgrounds, no longer need to worry about winning votes or avoiding controversy - and we are deeply committed to challenging injustice wherever we see it.

The Elders are an independent group of eminent global leaders, brought together by former South African president Nelson Mandela, who offer their influence and experience to support peace building, help address major causes of human suffering and promote the shared interests of humanity. We have decided to draw particular attention to the responsibility of religious and traditional leaders in ensuring equality and human rights and have recently published a statement that declares: "The justification of discrimination against women and girls on grounds of religion or tradition, as if it were prescribed by a Higher Authority, is unacceptable."

We are calling on all leaders to challenge and change the harmful teachings and practices, no matter how ingrained, which justify discrimination against women. We ask, in particular, that leaders of all religions have the courage to acknowledge and emphasise the positive messages of dignity and equality that all the world's major faiths share.

The carefully selected verses found in the Holy Scriptures to justify the superiority of men owe more to time and place - and the determination of male leaders to hold onto their influence - than eternal truths. Similar biblical excerpts could be found to support the approval of slavery and the timid acquiescence to oppressive rulers.

I am also familiar with vivid descriptions in the same Scriptures in which women are revered as pre-eminent leaders. During the years of the early Christian church women served as deacons, priests, bishops, apostles, teachers and prophets. It wasn't until the fourth century that dominant Christian leaders, all men, twisted and distorted Holy Scriptures to perpetuate their ascendant positions within the religious hierarchy.

The truth is that male religious leaders have had - and still have - an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions - all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views.

OBSERVER

Jimmy Carter was president of the United States from 1977 to 1981.

The Age

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Pinky Beecroft on Hillsong

To commemorate the Hillsong 2009 conference that's running at the moment I've decided to post a controversial and somewhat haunting article written by Pinky Beecroft (former singer of Machine Gun Fellatio) who decided to attend the church himself to see what all the fuss was about.

He originally penned this article for the Manic Times back in 2007, but it has since dropped off from their site. Fortunately, it can still be recovered via this web archive link! :)

http://web.archive.org/web/20070910034955/http://www.manictimes.com.au/node/246


I consider this compulsory reading for anyone who wants to understand the megachurch phenomenon; and I particularly advise that insiders take the time to digest it. (a warning to sensitive readers though; this essay contains some strong themes and a little salty language)


It's fascinating and disturbing, with good and evil seemingly running side-by-side, hand-in-hand. Yet amidst all the confusion Pinky seems to undergo some sort of change, some sort of connection with God, which is what makes this satirical piece all the more ironic and facinating. What exactly is going on here? You be the judge.

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Rapid prototyping 3D models of an unborn child

This technology is incredible; we actually use it in the aerospace industry to produce sub-scale prototypes for complex, difficult to manufacture parts. It has now found another unique niche in the medical industry, enabling women for the first time to hold a life-size replica of their growing baby.

Read the Daily Mail for rest of this astonishing story.

Saturday, June 27, 2009

Michael Jackson Tribute

To commemorate the sad passing of Michael Jackson I'm posting this classic clip from Robot Chicken today as a tribute. It really does help to explain so many aspects about his gifted, complicated life.

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

Keith Ward book review

Review of Keith Ward's book 'Why There Almost Certainly Is A God'

James Garth, May 2009.

Download PDF

Thursday, May 21, 2009

The Knack

This one brings a smile to my face every time...

Monday, May 11, 2009

Trailer Music Live

Words cannot express how much I want to go to this event.... but sadly my days of living within driving distance of Santa Monica are over... unless someone has recently invented a teleporter... in which case please contact me NOW!

Thursday, May 7, 2009

Josh McDowell circa 1979

I was dropping off some used books to Savers the other day when I noticed this little gem sitting in the pile. Thankfully, I rescued it, as this image of Josh McDowell from 1979 is absolutely priceless...


It doesn't take a prophet to predict that lapels won't ever get much bigger than that!

Thursday, April 23, 2009

NASA Earth Day Images


Spectacular...


More images available here.

Monday, April 6, 2009

The Real Difference Between Liberals and Conservatives



So how do I, as a VERY eclectic, self-proclaimed "moderate" fare? How will it rate me "socially", being someone who stands with the cliched 'conservaties' in opposing most forms of abortion, yet also feels strongly about issues of poverty alleviation, injustice and ecological stewardship? Or how will it rate me as a "moral utilitarian", being someone who essentially upholds just war theory and works in the defence industry for a living, yet when push comes to shove thinks actually using force against other human beings ought to be an absolute last resort?

There's only one way to find out - let's see if I can break the system.


My Results from www.YourMorals.org:


Moral Foundations Questionnaire
In the graph below, your scores on each foundation are shown in green (the 1st bar in each set of 3 bars). The scores of all liberals who have taken it on our site are shown in blue (the 2nd bar), and the scores of all conservatives are shown in red (3rd bar). Scores run from 0 (the lowest possible score, you completely reject that foundation) to 5 (the highest possible score, you very strongly endorse that foundation and build much of your morality on top of it).

Social Classes Questionnaire
Your Score (in green) is shown below, compared to the average of all our respondents who said they were brought up in households earning below the median (in orange) and compared to the average of all our respondents who said they grew up in households earning above the median (in black):


Well, these surveys certainly produce some interesting and pretty graphs. How they relate to practical morality, I am less certain. I will include more survey results if I feel so inclined to take them in the future... (ie. probably not :-)

Sunday, April 5, 2009

Does God Exist: Criag vs Hitchens debate

Last night one of the world's most entertaining and provocative atheists, Christopher Hitchens, and perhaps the world's most formidable orthodox Christian apologist, William Lane Craig, squared off at Biola University.

Personally, I am actually very excited that popular debates such as these that examine 'the Big Questions' in life are particularly in vogue at the moment. It was not always the case; one only needs to recall the several decades of antipathy which constituted the latter part of the 20th century, ie. where theologians and philosophers quibbled over which side should shoulder the 'burden of proof', or whether God was 'an incoherent concept'.

I am tipping that no such artificial scruples will hamper this debate. With the intellectual pedigree, strong debating experience and irascible personalities of these two participants, it will be 'on for young and old and' we are virtually guaranteed to witness a highly entertaining event.

I'll try to post footage and/or extracts as soon as they become available!

cheers,
James

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Let's Turn the World Around

One Just World comes to Melbourne on 7 April. For more information, click here.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

The Dawkins Letters - Book Review

Here is a link to my recent book review of David Robertson's book 'The Dawkins Letters: Challenging Atheist Myths', published in the journal Christian Perspectives on Science and Technology.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Catch The Fire Misses The Mark

Below is a reproduction of a comment that I posted tonight on the Catch The Fire website: which featured the following disturbing article:

http://catchthefire.com.au/blog/2009/02/10/media-release-abortion-laws-to-blame-for-bush-fires/#more-2215

Whilst I applaud your efforts to distribute physical assistance to those in need at this time, I think that your direct linking of these bushfires with Victoria’s recent abortion laws is insensitive and intellectually and biblically indefensible.
If God were willing to inflict systematic divine judgment in response to the state of Victoria’s political decision to change abortion laws, He could easily do so in a much more focussed manner by simply giving a heart attack to each person who contributed to signing these laws into effect.

Surely that would be a more appropriate and more just method of divine justice than using such an obtuse method to punish innocent men, women and children. We lost a dear Christian friend in these fires, a pillar of the community - and you dare to suggest that this was somehow enacted by God? To punish the innocent, those who by no means gave their consent to the political decisions being made many kilometers away?
Surely a more robust solution exists to this question of suffering. And that is this: God respects the integrity of the created order. God grants each individual complete freedom; freedom even to light bushfires and to destroy life, as well as freedom to show love and deep compassion. In recent days we have witnessed this freedom enacted on both ends of the spectrum.
As a Christian I repudiate your insistence in drawing such inferences in order to score points on a political and moral issue. I too personally believe that Victoria’s abortion laws ought to be amended. But speaking in God’s name based upon nothing more than insisting that correlation equals causation, is disturbing at best and blasphemous at worst.
James

Saturday, January 31, 2009

More on Faith and Doubt

I penned this as a response to an anonymous comment made on Centre for Public Christianity blog thread entitled 'The Strength of Doubt' - before I realized that the blog only accepts comments up to 200 words long - D'oh!!

So rather than waste the response, I've reproduced it here, should anyone wish to ponder it! :)

I would respectfully disagree with Anonymous' definition of 'Faith' whilst upholding his right to believe it. I submit that no serious theologian or thinker has ever held to such a definition, nor would any mainstream Christian denomination, past or present, endorse such an understanding of this term.

I think the fundamental error lies when 'faith' is defined as an epistemic category in its own right (both believers and non-believers frequently make this linguistic slip-up). I submit that faith, properly understood, is not about how you acquire knowledge, but about what you do with the knowledge that you have.

We ought to, I suggest, view faith as an act of trust and obedience, as a commitment to follow a course of action or a person in an instance where the outcome may not necessarily be known with certainty.

In this sense, we frequently exercise 'faith' in real life in non-religious settings. A voter who elects Kevin Rudd exercises faith in him, and in his policies. An individual who 'goes green' and strives to reduce their carbon footprint is expressing a degree of faith in the ability of mankind to successfully mitigate anthropogenic climate change. However in each case, the expression of faith is not irrational, but on the contrary is grounded in rationality.

But I suspect Anonymous' chief contention here is that the existence of suffering should in any case necessarily reduce the underlying rationality of the Christian God, and thus any attempt to 'gain deeper faith' from pondering this issue is actually an exercise in self-delusion. This is an intriguing contention which deserves further thought.

The existence of suffering is, of course, as Aquinas suggested, one of the two conceivable reasons for potentially rejecting the notion of an all-loving, interventionist God (though of course it would not obviate a deist God). But plausible defenses to the issue of suffering do in fact exist, and I think that it is by dwelling upon these philosophies that one's faith can, as it were, be 'strengthened'.

I submit that from the theist's perspective, the following two axioms are present; (i) that God respects the integrity of the created order, and (ii) that God does not, ever, violate free will.

From these it follows that God, if he exists, would have good cause to fashion the universe in a manner whereby it would be plausible to believe in his existence, and also plausible not to believe in his existence. To do otherwise would unduly coerce free will. God would, however, be free to reveal himself, in his own time and manner, to those who, through right action and intent, sought after him in some way.

At any rate, the point must be stressed that a God capable of bringing everything into existence must possess a prodigious degree of intelligence and power. He would be entirely capable of restoring, renewing and repairing any and all things that we view as irrevocably lost within this world, even people lost to death and destruction.

Indeed, it is upon this very notion - that God will restore and redeem the created order - culminating in resurrection itself - that the Christian hope rests. I contend that there are good grounds for believing that an extra-natural intelligence exists and that this mind has sought to reveal itself to mankind through the Christian tradition. Thus, it makes sense, by following Christ's teachings, to live one's life as though it were true.

cheers,
James

Thursday, January 8, 2009

An Atheist promotes God for Africa

Thanks to Ben Witherington III for the link:

As an atheist, I truly believe Africa needs God

Missionaries, not aid money, are the solution to Africa's biggest problem - the crushing passivity of the people's mindset

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Anne Rice's Spiritual Confession


Review by Time Magazine:

In 2002 Rice, the queen bat of vampire fiction, shed her fangs and began writing books (two so far) about the life of Jesus. This memoir is Rice's attempt to explain her return to Christianity, moving from the idyllic New Orleans of her 1940s childhood to the renunciation of her Catholic faith — indeed, of all faiths — during her student years and after in 1960s San Francisco. Rice's reminiscences about her ensuing atheist period and the success of her decidedly irreligious vampire novels are tinged with some sorrow; she moves earnestly on to the 90s, years in which, she says, a benevolent deity "hunted" her down until she gave in and accepted His divine love.

Audio Interviews
Anne Rice: From Darkness to Light (Part 1 of 2)
Anne Rice: From Darkness to Light (Part 2 of 2)

Visit the author's website, www.annerice.com

Monday, November 17, 2008

George Ellis - Faith, Hope and Doubt

Quite simply, this is one of the most rich, exciting and thought-provoking short books that I have ever had the pleasure of reading. For those who enjoy engaging in the science and theology dialogue; I highly commend it.

The pdf version can be downloaded for free from here.

Friday, November 14, 2008

The Alpha Course: Reviewed

There is an interesting debate featuring yours truly which is currently raging at the following site; if you are intrigued by discussions about the 'big questions' in life and wish to see those on opposite ends of the spectrum making their case as best they can. So far, it's been quite interesting and cordial.

Alpha Course: Reviewed
by Stephen Butterfield

Monday, October 20, 2008

An Inconvenient Tidbit

"An outrageous example of the attempted manipulation of scientific results concerns the reality and causes of climate change. Naomi Orestes analysed 928 randomly selected scientific papers published between 1993 and 2003 containing the keywords ‘global climate change’ (Science (2004) 306, 1686). Every one of them accepted that climate change was happening and that it is largely due to greenhouse gases released through human activities. Over the same period, 53% of 636 articles published in ‘serious’ American newspapers expressed doubt about the human contribution (Gore, A. An Inconvenient Truth, London: Bloomsbury (2006), p.263). Even more egregious – and on the same subject – was the acknowledgement of Philip Cooney, that he watered down reports on the adverse effects of human-derived emissions on climate when he was Chief of Staff of the White House Council on Environmental Quality. In a testimony to a congressional hearing (20 March 2007), he asserted, ‘My sole loyalty was to the President and advancing the policies of his administration.’ "

- Extract from The Research Scientist’s Psalm
R.J. BERRY

Science & Christian Belief 20 (2)

October 2008

http://www.scienceandchristianbelief.org